Republicans Warming Up For Rousing Chorus Of ‘A Black Woman, Okay, Just Not This Black Woman’


Supreme Court Question“I think you’re not going to find Republicans getting in the gutter like the Democrats did with Kavanaugh,” Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley informed CNN’s Manu Raju as he exited a lunchtime caucus assembly this afternoon.

“I just think we all don’t want to do the Kavanaugh thing,” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham agreed.

And everybody smiled and nodded like Graham didn’t throw an enormous tantrum within the nicely of the Senate on the suggestion that being credibly accused of tried rape ought to impede the set up of a replacement-level White man on the nation’s highest courtroom.

More to the purpose, nonetheless, it’s a little bit late for Republicans to assert to be taking the excessive street after President Biden promised to appoint a Black girl to fill retiring Justice Stephen Breyer’s seat and so they instantly let their gross, racist flags fly.

Just yesterday Ted Cruz referred to as it “actually an insult to Black women” that Biden would limit the pool of nominees based mostly on race and gender.

“You know, Black women are what, 6 percent of the U.S. population? He’s saying to 94 percent of Americans, ‘I don’t give a damn about you, you are ineligible,’” he sneered on his podcast “Verdict with Ted Cruz.”

Cruz supported Trump’s promise to interchange Justice Ginsburg with a feminine nominee endorsed by the Federalist Society and gushed at Justice Barrett’s affirmation listening to that “Your children have been wonderfully well behaved. I think you’re an amazing role model for little girls. What advice would you give little girls?”

But yesterday he professed himself disgusted that Biden would use any standards apart from pure benefit: “He’s not even pretending to say that, he’s saying, ‘If you’re a White guy, tough luck. If you’re a White woman, tough luck. You don’t qualify.’”

Pity the poor White guys who’ve solely made up 94 p.c of Supreme Court justices in historical past! When will they get a good shake?

And Cruz wasn’t the one one exhibiting his complete posterior.

“We’re going to go from a nice, stately left wing liberal to someone who’s probably more in the style of Sonia Sotomayor,” Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker complained Friday to a native radio host.

“The irony is that the Supreme Court is at the very same time hearing cases about this sort of affirmative racial discrimination while adding someone who is the beneficiary of this sort of quota,” he continued, alluding to the Court’s current resolution to take up affirmative motion in greater training now that Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg have been changed with Kavanaugh and Barrett.

“The majority of the court may be saying writ large it’s unconstitutional. We’ll see how that irony works out,” he added, as if the Court can be ruling on the legality of President Biden’s “quota” nominee.

Lest we overlook, we nonetheless don’t know who this nominee is. But with out figuring out something apart from her race and gender, Senator Wicker is certain she shall be an unseemly, unqualified radical. And whereas we’re taking this little journey down reminiscence lane, let’s additionally do not forget that Wicker had zero downside with Trump’s promise to place a girl in Justice Ginsburg’s seat. And in document time, too.

Maine Senator Susan Collins was a little bit bit higher, however not so much higher.

“I would welcome the appointment of a Black female to the court. I believe that diversity benefits the Supreme Court, but the way that the president has handled this nomination has been clumsy at best,” Collins informed ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “It adds to the further perception that the court is a political institution like Congress, when it is not supposed to be.”

Merrick Garland would possibly like a phrase.

Here’s how the senator tried to distinguish between Trump’s promise to instantly fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat with one other girl and Biden’s marketing campaign promise to appoint a Black girl:

Actually, this isn’t precisely the identical. I’ve checked out what was finished in each circumstances. And what President Biden did was as a candidate, make this pledge. And that helped politicize the whole nomination course of. What President Reagan mentioned is, as one among his Supreme Court justices, he want to appoint a girl. And he appointed a extremely certified one in Sandra Day O’Connor.

See, you may nominate a girl, even a Black girl. But you may’t say you’re nominating a Black girl, as a result of that’s enjoying politics with the Court, and Susan Collins can not abide such a factor.

Nope, no gutter politics right here. This will certainly not descend right into a screaming shitshow just like the Kavanaugh hearings.

LOL, WHO LIKES BEER?

GOP senator says Black girl Supreme Court choose can be ‘beneficiary’ of affirmative motion [CNN]
Biden’s dealing with of Supreme Court emptiness has been ‘clumsy at best’: Sen. Collins [ABC]
Critics slam Cruz for saying Biden’s vow to appoint first Black girl to Supreme Court is ‘offensive’ [WaPo]


Liz Dye lives in Baltimore the place she writes about legislation and politics.





Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.