Gender variations in meals decisions are surprisingly small

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — Whether shopping for natural, checking vitamin labels or recycling, women and men show strikingly related preferences, in line with the month-to-month Consumer Food Insights Report.

The survey-based report out of Purdue University’s Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability assesses meals spending, client satisfaction and values, help of agricultural and meals insurance policies, and belief in data sources.

“In this challenge, we break down our outcomes throughout male/feminine and married/single respondents. We wished to discover gender gaps in meals consumption and the impact of marriage decisions,” mentioned Jayson Lusk, the pinnacle and Distinguished Professor of Agricultural Economics at Purdue who leads the middle.

“We usually concentrate on variations in these experiences, however the similarity between women and men in a few of our knowledge is notable. Some would possibly assume that women and men go about their procuring in several methods with completely different priorities,” Lusk mentioned.

Similarities between the meals attributes that men and women worth is a part of this month’s Purdue Consumer Food Insights Report, a month-to-month report figuring out traits and modifications in client meals buying and preferences. (Purdue University picture/Courtesy of the Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability)
Download picture

If so, the middle’s newest report would possibly shock them.

All 4 classes of respondents said that they often select generic meals over brand-name meals, for instance. All 4 teams additionally mentioned they hardly ever select plant-based proteins over animal merchandise. And the 4 teams ranked six classes of meals attributes nearly precisely the identical from high to backside. The six attributes they rated so as of significance once they shopped for meals have been style, vitamin, affordability, availability, environmental affect and social duty.

Purdue specialists performed and evaluated the survey, which included 1,200 shoppers throughout the U.S.

Additional key outcomes embrace:

  • Food spending stays close to its 2022 peak.
  • Women face larger meals insecurity than males, however married ladies are faring a lot better.
  • Food satisfaction is highest amongst married males and lowest amongst single ladies.
  • Women and single individuals broadly categorical extra progressive meals politics.
  • Consumers eat much less seafood than advisable by Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

The September report features a new query about how individuals outline the time period “regenerative,” which is presently a sizzling buzzword in meals and agriculture.

“Based on our outcomes, ‘regenerative’ appears to be synonymous with ‘sustainable’ within the minds of many shoppers,” Lusk mentioned. “Interestingly, some practices that sometimes fall below ‘regenerative,’ equivalent to no-till farming, are comparatively a lot much less related to ‘regenerative.’”

That could imply the time period has but to penetrate the general public notion as a selected, cohesive strategy for producing and consuming meals, he famous.


The Purdue Consumer Food Insights report discovered that the majority shoppers have a tough time defining and conceptualizing the time period “regenerative” within the context of agriculture. Consumers have been most certainly to affiliate the time period with “sustainable” or “eco-friendly” and least doubtless with “no-till” or “native.” (Purdue University picture/Courtesy of the Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability)
Download picture

Consumers expectations for annual meals worth inflation continued to say no, indicating their

confidence that the rise in meals costs will quickly average. Official authorities knowledge, nevertheless, present costs persevering with to extend at unprecedented charges, mentioned Sam Polzin, a meals and agricultural survey scientist for the middle and the report’s co-author.

As of August, grocery costs are up 13.5% over final yr, and specialists counsel the components driving meals inflation, together with labor and commodity prices, warfare, and excessive climate, will stick round,” Polzin mentioned. “It is a ready sport to see if client instinct is indicative of the long run or if their inflation expectations will return up.”

The survey’s general meals insecurity quantity remained steady at 14% of households. Polzin finds this stunning given all of the discuss excessive meals costs. How to elucidate this stays elusive.

“We can solely speculate that customers have been capable of cope by way of avenues like pandemic financial savings, authorities security internet applications, spending on bank cards and pulling again on different discretionary

spending,” he mentioned. “The disparity between married and single individuals is hanging, too. On this level, marriage straight gives small advantages, like feeding extra individuals with fewer prices, however it is usually correlated with different financial benefits.”

Lusk additional discusses the report in his weblog.

The Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability is a part of Purdue’s Next Moves in agriculture and meals techniques and makes use of progressive knowledge evaluation shared by way of user-friendly platforms to enhance the meals system. In addition to the Consumer Food Insights Report, the middle gives a portfolio of on-line dashboards.

Writer: Steve Koppes

Media contact: Maureen Manier, [email protected]
Source: Jayson Lusk, [email protected]

Agricultural Communications: 765-494-8415;

Maureen Manier, Department Head, [email protected]

Agriculture News Page